I’m
sure everyone’s expecting my Marvel Studios Films reviews to be expansion on:
Woo!
It was awesome!
That
is not the case for Captain America:
Civil War.
At
this stage, the movieverse they’ve constructed is complex and deep enough to
delve further into intriguing espionage type adventures and craft a film that
was layered, compelling, and filled with deep and conflicting emotions.
However,
since it’s set in the same universe as all their other films, it still had
many, “Woo! That was awesome!” moments.
And
frankly, since life itself tends to be filled with deep and conflicting
emotions, we could all use a few more “Woo that was awesome!” moments.
Before
I get any further, the Star Wars dominance of this year needs to rear its head
with a question:
Since
Marvel went out of its way to have a “sneaky” Empire Strikes Back reference in all of the phase two movies, why
did they wait until the start of phase three to throw in a giant, overt one?
I’m
trying to avoid specific spoilers, but the movie is called Civil War and all the promotion material is
based upon choosing sides and superheroes beating the snot out of each other. Therefore I feel
justified in working off the basis that the splintering of the Avengers into
two factions led by Tony and Steve that disagree with each other is a given and
not a spoiler.
Comic
fans are odd- for more reasons than I comfortably have time to list. We love superhero fights, we demand to see
superhero fights, we argue incessantly about superhero fights…
Yet
we get our panties in a bunch if the reasons for the superhero fights don’t
line up with our personal world views of the characters. The Marvel Comics' Civil War and Avengers
Disassembled arcs were both heavily
criticized for using mischaracterizations to force the desired outcomes.
The
Marvel Cinematic Universe yet again benefited from taking it’s time to build
itself up organically, piece by piece. (Unlike
some other company’s superhero fight movie I could mention that appears to have
been thrown together at the last minute based on a couple of focus groups and
some unrelated comic book story references.)
Both
sides of the conflict had sympathetic, logical and believable reasons for their
stance on the central issue.
Cap
and Iron Man (as well as the rest of the Avengers and some new comers) also had
personal attachments, loyalties and emotions that were completely keeping
within their characters. This made the
devolving of a disagreement on principal into a full on battle also organic and
believable.
And
speaking of battles, towering over the other massively impressive action
scenes, they totally blew out all the reserves for that airport fracas.
I do believe it rivaled the extreme insanity of any of our Up the Lake table top TSR Marvel Super Heroes game battles. Yet, they made sure the power of the strong bonds of trust and friendship between combatants was conveyed, including which ones were damaged, and which were strengthened during and after the epic kerfuffle.
I do believe it rivaled the extreme insanity of any of our Up the Lake table top TSR Marvel Super Heroes game battles. Yet, they made sure the power of the strong bonds of trust and friendship between combatants was conveyed, including which ones were damaged, and which were strengthened during and after the epic kerfuffle.
The
villain also helped matters along. While
the least over the top, I do think he was the most intelligent, focused, and
therefore successful bad guy to show up in a Marvel film so far.
Doing
a “Civil War” requires a large number of heroes, and this film had 'em, but it
is, unquestionably, Captain America’s movie.
The plot and the viewer’s emotional investment in it are tied to Steve
and those he had the closest attachments to.
Being the field leader of the Avengers is one of Cap’s defining traits.
With that established, it wouldn’t make sense to follow his story without the
team. All the other heroes had a purpose
for being there, and new and old interactions were allowed to flourish on the
sidelines of the main story. (I could have done without the old Marvel fall
back of “our female heroes have problems controlling their powers” but you
can’t have everything.)
Ant-Man
brought the lightness of his film for his appearance, and Spidey added a
similar tone, as he usually does in group situations. There were some nice nods to Peter’s burden
of responsibility hinted at, to pave the way to show him as joking and quipping
in the face of both external and internal adversity.
With
all of the extra characters thrown in, it would have been easy to lose Cap as
the center. However, it is his
connections, driven by his beliefs and his loyalties that carry the movie from
one key moment to the other. With Steve
and Tony as the two prime driving forces behind the Avengers, the differences
between the two took this movie into darker places than the Marvel Universe has
gone before while remaining true to both of them.
However, the bonds of trust and friendship that the two had formed, not only with the Avengers on both sides, but primarily with each other, allowed the darkness to be illuminated by hope for the future.
And
that’s really what super heroes are all about.
Note: No Redwing did not defect to Tony's side, nor is he jealous of the awesome movie robot that replaced him...its the only way he stays on Sam.
Agreed on all points! What a movie!
ReplyDeleteThanx for sharing, glad you enjoyed it.
ReplyDelete