My Nth cousin Xce removed Bobby Conte-Thornton’s rapidly rising star recently brought him to the illustrious
McCarter Theater in Princeton.
I still don’t have much
clue about the world of plays. I’m using “illustrious” based on the two Tony’s
they have in the lobby, not any personal experience. The only acts I’ve seen
there are New Wave A Capella singing group The Bobs (who I’ve also seen in a
small church, and an artsy-folksy coffee house type restaurant) and the original line up of juggling
legends the Flying Karamazov Brothers. (Sadly, jugglers never make a joint
illustrious.)
I’m honestly starting to
think that I’m cursed when it comes to attending the legitimate stage. Because
the tickets showed that the usual parking lot was closed due to construction,
my pre drive research extended well beyond my normal paranoia.
I had the local map on
the tickets, a second slightly wider view printed map, plus the GPS maps in my
and my wife’s phones working. I studied
the location and printed step by step directions and determined all we needed
to do was pass the place, make a right followed by a quick left, and then
follow the road through a circle to the next left for the nearby parking
garage.
Simple though it was, I
went to work crazy early Friday morning to give us an added expanse of
time. The route was direct, no traffic
was showing on Rosa’s more highly advanced guidance system and we were on track
to arrive with about an hour safety cushion before curtain.
To prevent frantically
wandering around an unfamiliar area looking for dinner when we arrived, the
cushion allowed us to stop in an area packed with strip malls to grab a fast
bite. It would seem that all Five Guys,
and then some, have to do something with the food at the restaurant named after
them before they are allowed to think about bringing it to the patrons. The single occupancy rest room added to the
insanely slow service (for insanely average food might I add) destroyed most of
our safety cushion. We piled back into the car in haste with the predicted
arrival time now hovering near ten minutes before curtain.
Those estimates are
always conservative if there isn’t traffic, and I shaved a couple more minutes
off without much reckless endangerment of my family or any other motorists.
There should have been
no problem as I pulled up towards the garage with time to walk over to the
McCarter.
However, it’s me.
At what I now know is
the entrance to the garage appeared to be a “do not enter” sign. From the angle I had turned in, it looked
like instead of telling me not to drive to the restricted part of the train
station, it was telling me not to enter the garage.
If my wife is in the
area when I mention this unfortunate driving occurrence, she will quickly point
out that she knew it was the right way and was telling me to pull in.
What she will not
quickly point out is what happened shortly before. I was asking her to confirm
my memorized directions as I went through them step by step. When I asked, “Then I go through the circle,
right?” despite having no less than FOUR maps –both electronic and printed- in
front of her she said, “There’s no circle.”
I will not bring this up
again, as there’s no need to force myself to sleep on the lawn.
With my usual faith in
her navigation skills shaken, I asked a passing student if that was the
entrance to the garage.
Unfortunately, the
Princetonian Poopyhead said, “No, just go around that way,” sending us to the
back of the structure, where there was only an exit. (And some newly laid
profanity.) We pulled into the lot
behind that garage and were now further away, and later.
I noticed my phone was
being stupid about ignoring the fact we could cut across campus at the same
time that Rosa’s phone was telling her to do just that. We made it to our seats in time to hear the
thickly accented Italian mother, “Turn off your phones,” announcement that would
set the tone for an amazing night of comedy.
Ken Ludwig’s A Comedy of Tenors is a classic French farce, and as such
is perfectly at home on stage. Farce can
work on television (Fawlty Towers)
and film (Oscar) but its best as live
theater for two reasons.
1) Comedy is all about timing
and farce even more so. Honing it night
after night in front of a live audience gets all the gags’ and reactions’
timing down to split second perfection.
This is why the best
Marx Brothers' movies either came from plays, or had a brief live tour of the
important scenes. Brace yourself for
more Marx Brothers and similarly themed references; it’s a natural outflow from
seeing classic stage comedy and my head being full of useless vaudevillian
information.
2) The farce works best
in one vast room with a pile of furniture to trip and/ or be hurled over and a
boatload of slammable doors going in and out of it. Keeping the entire story in
a single room works perfectly in the conventions of a play. Note the two examples above have that room (Fawlty Towers’ lobby or dining room, and
Oscar’s Foyer…or dining room) however
because of the nature of those mediums (media?
medians? medio-la-hee-hoos?) the action must go through those doors at
times.
On stage, the action
stays front and center, without the audience feeling claustrophobic about the
narrative remaining in one room, because that’s what plays do. A mess of the
humor comes from hidden events unfolding on the other side of the doors. Much like how Jack Benny’s comedy came from
what he didn’t say when the audience imagined what he was thinking, the farce’s
comedy comes from what isn’t seen when the audience imagines what is happening
off stage.
Since “that’s what it’s
supposed to look like” it didn’t truly hit me while I was laughing along that
nearly the whole experience took place in one room. Only Ken Ludwig’s trademark of rerunning all
of the action in two minutes before the final curtain drove it home.
Note: I still have no
idea what I’m talking about. I only know that’s a Ken Ludwig trademark because
my cousin’s mom told me so. I’ve never seen one of his plays before. Although
after this one, I’d certainly see one again.
The material and
environment are important to the absurd situations of the farce being accepted
by the crowd, but the cast is far more vital to engage the audience and insure
the timing for maximum comedy. Fortunately, this group was sensational. It’s a testament to how good the play was
that I found myself entering “funny” over and over again into the Word
Thesaurus to avoid repeating myself.
I’ll start with Bobby
playing Carlo, because it’s my blog, and he’s my cousin. We’ve always known he could sing, learned
rapidly he could act, and were given some inkling in Grease that he could do
physical comedy. However, this
performance drove home that the boy knows funny. Carlo is half of the young, romantic couple
in this story. In that way, one could
say he played “the Zeppo role.” I mean
that as a strong compliment, don’t be hating on Zeppo. Even Zeppo himself didn’t fully appreciate
his critical importance to the act. Note
that when he stopped appearing in Marx Brothers’ films to be their agent full
time, Alan Jones or someone else was always brought in to fulfill “the Zeppo
role.”
As Carlo was in the dark
about most of the misunderstandings driving the farce, his humor was predominantly
reactive. While being flabbergasted at
his surroundings and trying to determine exactly what just happened, Bobby pulled
some double, triple, and extended takes the great animation director Bob
Clampett would have been proud of. His aptitude
for physical comedy was also impressive. It ranged from being part of the
general running and screaming that goes with this form of theater, combining
surprise, confusion and pain at being slapped for reasons he was completely
unsure about, and a wonderful bit while he was given a severe, yet severely entertaining,
beating by a door in his underwear.
That is…he was in his
underwear, and he was battered repeatedly by a door.
He was not accosted by a
door built into his underwear. It wasn’t
that kind of show.
Because we’ve heard him
sing, we were kind of stunned when we heard he was in a new show that wasn’t a
musical. However, there were a couple
musical moments on stage that fit far more seamlessly into the narrative than
the way the numbers were wedged into comedies to advertize them in the Golden
Age of Hollywood. His and the other Tenors’ (and a Soprano’s) truly remarkable
singing ability, and their ability to stay in character while performing, added
depth and realism to the play. For example, their talents allowed the plot and
their character interactions advance through the musical rehearsal number while
still being a breathtaking operatic performance.
One of the other Tenors
was Max, the “Tenor in training” and producer’s assistant played by Rob McLure. Max was constantly pulled in
multiple directions by the rest of the characters, and also was the guy on our side of the dramatic irony fence with
the closest idea of what was really going on amidst all the confusion,
misdirection and replacements. Mr.
McClure carried that burden well while performing outstanding pratfalls and
other physical shenanigans the whole time. His skills made me wish I could have
seen him play the lead in Chaplin: the Musical.
In case you're wondering- I'm still clueless, my cousin's mom told me about Chaplin too.
I’ve continually voiced how awesome it is that theater performers interact directly with audiences after shows, and I’m going to again.
I’ve continually voiced how awesome it is that theater performers interact directly with audiences after shows, and I’m going to again.
It is awesome that
theater performers interact directly with audiences after shows.
One would think I’d get
better at assembling my thoughts into something short and coherent to say at
these moments, now that I’m more experienced with them.
Yeah…not so much.
I was hoping to impart
the compliment of - after being a fan of vaudeville style comedy my entire
life- I found his energy executing and timing of physical comedy on stage to be
an outstanding example of the art form.
I sincerely hope he
gathered all that as I quickly shouted to him after he signed my daughter’s
program and before he was whisked away to other groups, “You fall really well!”
The third tenor,
probably the main tenor, and also (because it’s a farce) the fourth tenor was
Bradley Dean. If anyone could be said to carry a show where the interaction
between all the players was key to it working as a whole it would be him.
He was the
overprotective (of both his family and standing as an operatic star) Tito, and
the identical looking, aspiration filled (if easily distracted) Beppo. In both parts he excelled as portraying both
the driving force, and bewildered victim of the multiple waves of confusion
that constructively interfered with each other as the chaos grew.
Yup, that was a physics
reference I threw into a play review, in case we forget I’m an engineer.
Speaking of driving
forces, Antoinette LaVecchia became one of those as Maria for her on stage
family, as befitting an Italian mother.
Also as befitting an Italian mother, she became a virtual roman candle
of powerful emotions, each one loud, explosive, somewhat random and a pleasure
to watch as it lit up the stage.
Linda Brescia had a
similar impact on the room as Tatiana, the Russian Soprano. She didn’t enter
until the second act, but quickly made up for lost time striding onto the set
with all the over the top, Ensign Chekov type accented, fire and expression
expected from an operatic diva.
Both she and Antoinette
LaVecchia had the amazing ability to be physically and verbally laying into a
target man one moment (either violently or romantically), then convincingly and
sympathetically fainting the next. In
both cases, the end result was an outright hoot.
The third woman who
successfully brought a parade of humorous emotions to the stage was Kristen Martin as daughter Mimi, bringing us back around to the other half of the young
lovers. Similar to Bobby, much of her
comedy was expertly done reactions. (And one stellar dive off the balcony.) In
addition, since she was portraying an aspiring actress, she also got to display
fantastic deliveries of the self-referential comedy.
There really are only a
finite number of stories in existence, especially when creating something with
rules and expectations like classic French Farce. Poking fun at those conventions while
performing them was a nice addition of meta-humor.
Sorry, went a little
“Douglas Hofstadter” there…back to the show.
The cast was completed
by Ron Orbach as Saunders, the perpetually frustrated producer battling all of
the ridiculous reverses of the narrative to get ANY opera singers on stage on
time. After the performance I heard his
wife say something to my cousin’s mother about Frank Ferrante’s (amazing)
Groucho show. That was a perfectly appropriate
random reference, as Saunders was highly reminiscent of Sig Ruman’s Mr.
Gottlieb role in Night at the Opera. (Or
any of his other roles with Minnie’s Boys)
While his frustration was constant, his always laugh inducing
expressions of it shifted impressively between red faced, volcanic hysteria,
and slow burns rivaling Edgar Kennedy.
There was one major
difference between Gottlieb and Saunders.
Underneath the exasperated and demanding exterior of the producer in A Comedy of Tenors was revealed to be
the heart of a caring and devoted father.
That aspect was a key to
separating this story from much of today’s comedy.
In contrast to the
chaos, the yelling, the violence, the running around, the fooling around, and
the general farceness; at its core the story was about the importance of
family, with all the love, commitment and respect that goes with it. In some way, that was the central motivation
of each and every one of these well portrayed and constantly entertaining
characters.
If I properly motivated
myself, and more importantly wasn’t busy writing recollections of my own farce
like life, I could have rushed this review to inspire people to see the final showing
of this play before the run at the McCarter finished.
However, given the
experience of the writer, cast and crew, and the quality of the material and
performances they’ve put together, I’ve no doubts this play will be reappearing
for all of our viewing pleasure before long.
2 comments:
Wonderful and accurate summary. I have to add that although the story content of the play was really suited for older audiences, my three (ages 9, 7 and 3) all loved it. Most of the actual "plot" was over their heads, but the physical comedy was so great it had them laughing along with the rest of the audience. The emotions portrayed by the actors were so genuine and convincing that when they were calling the "fourth tenor" to hurry and get to the stage, Morgan became so worried he jumped up from his seat and started yelling (loudly) along with the rest of the cast "BEPPO!!!!" and was very relieved when Beppo showed up to sing.
Thanx for the compliments, and chiming in.
This show really did work on several levels..and all of them were funny.
Yet, at no time, for the expense of a cheap laugh, did any of the characters act untrue to themselves or their families.
Amazing job all around.
Post a Comment