Caught
two kid’s Christmas movies this week. Oddly both had complex, multi stage
mechanisms in them to perform simple tasks.
The reasons were somewhat different, however.
One
of them was because it was Disney putting a hero’s journey story into another
borrowed Victorian era fantasy setting.
The
other was because it Doctor Seuss lived for that sort of thing.
I
didn’t go see The Nutcracker and the Four
Realms for the story or music. I
went because I knew Disney would create a visually amazing, mutli faceted
fantasy world and I wanted to experience it on the big screen. I was not disappointed.
I’m
convinced Disney designs movies now with the idea they can build an entire
theme park land around them.
The
story is a basic and straight forward tale of a young woman on the hero’s
journey, overcoming her self-doubt to save the day, and growing up some in the
process.
The
fact that she does it primarily through intellect and invention was a nice nod
to the value of those items.
Nothing
overly groundbreaking in story method or internal motivations here, but the
characters were all likeable and relatable, meaning following them along the journey
was easy and satisfying. As expected,
the imagery was insanely stunning, and completely worth the price of admission
to see on the big screen.
I need to mention Misty Copeland was in it, as its the whole reason my ballerina daughter wanted to see it.
I need to mention Misty Copeland was in it, as its the whole reason my ballerina daughter wanted to see it.
It's
a beautiful looking take on a well-known tale with a few partially obvious twists
to keep it from being completely predictable, and a few bits for those with
mouse or clown phobias to give them the need for several therapy sessions.
In
another return to a well-known tale, Illumination’s The Grinch Who Stole Christmas premiered this week.
Both
the previous Jim Carrey live action version and this outing realized that you
can’t expand the classic children’s Christmas book to feature film length and
have the main character be completely unlikable most of the time. The Carrey version did it by making the
Whovillians a bunch of jerks who were over focused on the commercial aspects of
Christmas, which may have reduced the likability of that one as a whole.
This
new take keeps the Whos as sweet, pure, and caring as they were in the book,
with their main focus on the togetherness and giving aspects of the season.
The
Grinch’s malice comes from a much briefer backstory, and his grouchiness
focuses much more on chosen isolation. He's also much more of a Disney World Character type villain than a Disney Movie Villain. Those of you who frequent the parks know what I mean.
He’s
given a stronger relationship with Max, as well as with Fred the chunky
reindeer, to allow this main character to be more likable in the longer story
form.
Cindy
Lou Who is well over two this time around, and share’s the Grinch’s ability to
create complex mechanisms laying a straight forward path for their bonding, and
giving us another S.T.E.M. based hero, yay!
Overall
it's a sweet and fun take on the classic book that look and feels like Doctor
Seuss, with more than a hint of the humor from the folks who brought the world
the Minions.
No comments:
Post a Comment